John Company

Final Personnel Record for Newhouse, Delbert C., U.S. Navy, 1957

DOW-UAP-D104 · page 528 of 585

Page 528 of 585 of DOW-UAP-D104

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

L_
19. In comparlson·wlth other officers of his grade and approximate length of service or approximate length of duty asslg nment, to what degree has t his officer exhl bited
the following qualities?
(a) PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE (Conside r the requirements of his various duty assignments and compare them to his professional knowledge)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Hns exceptional ln1owledge
ol his duty assignments.
Extremely well informed.
.
Hns e•ccllent knowledge of
most phases ol his duty
nssignments. Is well in­
formed on tho remaining
phases. Occasionally dcm­
onstrotes exceptional know I-
edge.
Is well informed on most
phases ol his duty nssign­
ments. Frequently demon­
strotcs oxccJJcnt knowledge.
Has sntislnctory knowledge
ol routine phases ol his duty
nssignmcuts.
Serious gaps in his know!­
edge ol lundamontals ol his
duty assignments.
(Adverse)
I
X
I
I
I
.
(b) COOPERATION (Consider ability and willingness to work In harmony with and for others.)
Nor .OBSERVED
□
E,trcmely succcsslnl in
working with others. Has
an out.standing ability to
create harmony.
P romotes harmony in deal­
ing with others. A very
good team worker.
Oets along well with most
people. Knows how to take
orders. Fits in witb a team.
Indl!Ioront to others.
Cooperates occasionally.
Inclined to creat~ friction.
Oenerolly not coopcroti\'C,
(A1lverse)
.
I
X
I
I
I
.
(c) J UDGMENT (Consider his ability to grasp a situation, think clearly, and develop correct and logical conclusions.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Outstandingly sound and
logical thinker with an
exceptional grnsp ol the
situation involved.
Exceptionally good Judg­
mcnt bnsed on sound evalu­
atlon or all tho factors
Involved.
J udgment is usually sound
and reasonable.
Is prone to neglect or mis­
interpret !nets. Occasion­
ally commits errors in
Judgmcut.
Duo to lnulty judgment, his
decisions or rccommenda­
tions are too frequently
wrong.
(Adverse)
.
I
I
X
I
I
.
•.
NOT OBSERVED
□
Outstanding skill in direct-
ing others results in a very
offectivo w1it. Inspires con­
!ldence even under very
difficult circumstances.
A consistently good leader.
Oommauds respect or his
subordinates. Is very effec­
tive under difficult circum­
stances.
Oapnblo leader. Develops
good cooperation and team
work in difficult circum­
stances. Knows bow to give
orders.
Generally obtains c!Iectivo
cooperation under normal
circumstances.
Fails to command. Unable
to exert control.
(Adverse)
.
I
I
X
I
I
.
(d) LEADERSHIP (Consider his ability In organizing, obtaining the cooperation of others, and In directing their efforts effecuvely.)
(e) PROMOTION POTENTIAL (Consider his capacity to handle Jobs of Increased scope and greater responsibility, ability to learn rapidly, personality, self. Improvement
efforts, special abilities, and training.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Capableof increased respon­
sibility and rapid advance-
moot.
V cry promising promotional
material.
Demonstrates promise for
further growth at moderate
rote.
Present job is taxing his
capabilities. Requires con­
sidcroblenmount or training.
Definitely limited.
(Adverse)
.
I
X
I
I
I
.
(f) MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS (Consider his utilization of men, money, and materials.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Is most e!Iective in theutili­
zation or men, money, and
materials.
Is effective in accomplishing
extra savings in men, mon­
ey, and materials by imple­
menting and maintaining
improved management pro­
cedures.
Conserves men, monoy, and
materials e!Iectively by im•
plementing and maintain•
ing routine management
procedu res.
Utilizes men, money, and
materials in a barely satis­
factory manner.
Is needlessly wasteful or
men, money, nnd materials.
Is irresponsible
in
this
regard .
(Adverse)
I
X
I
I
I
(g) REMARKS. Marks In any of the starred (') boxes must be Justified In this section with a brief descri ption of the factors which were considered In evaluating the
officer. The justification should be In concrete and specific terms.
None
20. State your estimate of this officer's capacity for original and constructive professional work and Indicate to what degree his performance during this reporti ng
period ~as reflected that capacity. State concrete attainments wherever possible.
If not observedi so state.
CW04 NEWHOUSE has had sever al excellent and ori gi na i deas to impr ove t he efficient
oper ation of t he Phot o Lab.
Hi s pr ofessional wor k has been i n keeping with t he hi gh
standards of naval traditi on.
21. (a) As a general rule, officers should not be shown their fitness reports by the reporting seniors unless the report contains adverse matter. An adverse report
must be referred for statement pursuant to Article 1701-(8) Navy Regulations.
His statement should be attached to.this. report.
(b) Has the officer reported on seen this report?
YES □
22. DATE FORWARDED _
___;1::::....,7L-...CF--=E'--'=B,c_1 .....9....5.....6,____
24. ----~----,.--,----,---,--,-;----,-,----.,,,:,----­
(Sio11altt rt of reoular report.in(I 3enior if rt port i& concurunl)
u. !; . GOV£1UOl[NT PRINTIIIG orricr.
10-10100-1
-
•