Final Personnel Record for Newhouse, Delbert C., U.S. Navy, 1957

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

• •
I
.
.
19. In comparison with other officers of his grade and approximate length of service or approximate lenEth of duty assignment to what degree has this officer exhibited
t he following qualities?
.
'
(a) PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE (Consider the requirements of his various duty assignments and compare them to his professional knowledge )
NOT OBSERVED
□
Has excopt!onal knowledge
or his duty nssigumon ts.
Extremely well informed.
.
Has oxcollont knowledge or
most phases or his duty
assignments. Is well in­
formed on tbo remaining
pbnscs. Occaslonolly dom­
onstrates oxcepUoool know!-
edge .
Is won informed on most
phnsos or his duty assign-
ments. Frequently demon­
strates oxcollent knowledgo.
Has satisfactory knowledge
or routine phases ol his duty
nss!gnments.
Serious gaps in his know!­
edge or fundamontols of bis
duty assignments.
(Adver,o)
.
I
I
X
I
I
.
(b) COOPERATION (Consider ability a nd willingness to work In harmony with and for others.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Extremely succosslul in
working with others. Hns
on outstanding ability to
crcoto harmony.
Promotes bormony in dcol­
ing with others. A very
good tcom worker. .
Oots along well with most
people. Knows how to take
orders. Fits iu\vith o team.
IndifTcrcnt to others.
Cooperates occasionally.
Inclined to crcoto friction.
Oonerally not cooperative.
.
-
(Ad,•erso)
•
I
I
X
I
I
.
(c) JUDGMENT (Consider his ability to grasp a situation, think clearly, a nd develop correct and loelcal conclusions.)
Exceptionally good Judg-
Outstandingly sound and
Judgmout is usually sound
Is prone to neglect or mis-
Duo to faulty Jucih'lllent, his
NOT OBSERVED
ment based on sound ovalu­
logical thinker with an
and reasonable.
interpret Cnets. Occasion-
decisions or rccommcndn­
ation or an tho factors
o.,coptlonal grasp or the
any commits errors in
tions ore too frequently
iJlvolvcd.
situation involved.
Judgmeut.
wrong.
□
(Adverso)
.
.
I
I
X
I
I
(d) LEADERSHIP (Consider his ability In organizing, obtaining the cooperation of others, and In directing their efforts effectively.)
I NOT OBSERVED
□
Outst.anding skill in direct­
ing others results in a very
cflective unit. Inspires con­
fidence oven under very
difficult cirenmstnncos.
A consistently good lender.
Commands respect or his
subordinates. Is very eflcc­
tlvc under difficult circum­
stances.
Capable lender. Develops
good cooperation and team
work in dimcult circum­
stances. Knows how to givo
orders.
Ocncrally obt..~il1s of!cctivo
cooperation under nonnol
circumstances.
Foils to command. Unable
to exert con trot.
(Ad verso)
I
I
X
I
I
(e) PROMOTION POTENTIAL (Consider his capacity to handle Jobs of Increased scope and greater responsibility, ability to learn rapidly, personality, self.improvement
efforts, special abilities, and training.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Capobloofincrcnsed rcspon­
sibility and rapid advance­
ment.
.
Very promising promotional
material.
Demonstrates promiso for
further growth at moderate
rate.
Present Job is taxing his
ropabilities. Requires con­
siderablo omouu t of training.
Definitely limited.
(Ad,·crsc)
I
I
X
I
I
.
(I) MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS (Consider his utlllzatlon of men, money, and materials.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Is most efTcctivo in tho utlli-
zatiou or men, money, nod
materials.
Is efTecLivc iu accomplishing
extra savings in men, mou­
cy, and materials by imple­
mcntiug and maintaining
lmpro,•ed management pro­
ccdures.
Conserves men, money, and
materials eflcctivcly by im­
omenting and maiutaiu­
~ g routine management
procedures.
Utilizes men, money, nnd
materials in a barely sotis­
factory manner.
Is needlessly wasteful or
men, money, :-md materials.
Is
irresponsible ill
this
regard.
(Adverse)
.
I
I
X
I
I
.
(g) REMARKS. Marks In any of the starred (' ) boxes must be Justified In this section with n brief description of the factors which were considered In evaluating the
officer. The Justification should be In concrete and specific terms.
None
20. State your estimate of this officer's capacity for original and constructive professional work and Indicate to what degree his performance during this reporting
period has reflected that capacity. State concrete attainments wherever possible. If not observed, so state.
Not observed
21. (a) As a ·general rule, officers should not be shown their fitness reports by the reporting seniors unless the report contains adverse matter. An adverse report
must be referred for statement pursuant to Article 1701-(8) Navy Regulations.
His statement should be attached to this report .
• ~:" . \
e offlcer'reported on seen this report?
YES □ NO [1!l
, '
\
\ 3 JAN 1956
22. DAT E RlRWARDED ,,__________ _________
\
24. - ---~~ .,......---,,---,---
...,.,.---,----,,,----,-,----.,---
-
­
(Signature of regular reporting ,enior if report i• co11curre11t)
\
_.,,
U. S. GOVCANNCNT PRINTING OFFICE
10-70109-1