Final Personnel Record for Newhouse, Delbert C., U.S. Navy, 1957

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

-•·
- FEB 02 19!lac;­
NAVPERS•3 10 (REV, 3. 54)
~EPoRr ON THE FITNESS OF OFFICERS•
•
THE OFFICER REPORTED ON WILL FILL IN THE FIRS,: EL-EVEN SECTIONS:
1. NAME (La.,t)
(Fir,t)
(Mid(lle)
2. GRADE
3 . USN (R)
4. DESIGNATOR
5. FILE NO.
NEWHOUSE
Delbert
Clement
CHPHOT
USN
8.311
17728.3
6. SHIP OR STATION
Utility Squadron FIVE
8. OCCASION FOR REPORT
9. TYPE OF REPORT
SEMI-
r-;;;t
DETACHMENT OF
□ DETACHMENT □
JV7
CON-
□
ANNUAL ~ REPORTI NG SENIOR
OF OFFICER
REGULAR ~ J CURRENT
SPECIAL
7 . DATE REPORTED PRESENT DUTY STATION
2 July 1954
10. PERIOD OF REPORT
8-14-54
TO 12-.31-54
FROM
□
11. DUTIES. Lfat principal dutie& a'8ioned includino watch<&, and indicate in parenthe,e, after each the number of month, during the reportino period. If a'8ionment i, in olher than
reoul ar Navv billet or involves duties 110! well e tab fahed, give outline of ;purpo,e, 1co;pe, and 11gnificance of ,ucl, dutie,. If neceuarv, u.ie ,eparate •heel and attach to thi, form.
Phot
a hie Officer
•
Squadron Dut y Offi cer (4)
Sionature of officer reported on:
FOLLOWING TO BE FILLED IN BY THE REPORTING OFFICER:
12. EMPLOYMENT OF COMMAND DURING PERIOD OF THIS REPORT
General utility services, WESPAC area.
13. REFERENCE HERE AND APPEND ANY COMMENDABLE OR ADVERSE REPORTS ON T HIS OFFICER RECEIVED DURING THE PERIOD OF THIS REPORT
None.
14. PERFORMANCE OF DUTIES (Tn comparison with other officer, of hi• grade and approxi mate length of ,ervice, conaider the requirement• ofhi, dutie, and evaluate hil performance.)
DUTY ASSIGNMENT
(a) Present Assignment
(b) As Sqnadr on
Watch Officer
(c) Collateral Duties
(d) Technical Speclalty lJhr,t",,-.,e"'a:'n :r
(e) Ship Handling
(f) In Administration
(g) Ability t o Command
(h) As Executive or Division Officer
(I) Duty on a Staff
Ul Ot her
N
Out standi ng per -
Excellent perform-
Competent and effi-
Sntisroctory per-
0
T
formnnco in most
anccin mostnspects
cient performance
formance in most
aspects or his duty
or his duty n.ssign-
in most aspects or
aspects of bis duty
0
assignments. High-
ments. Efficient or
his duty assign-
assignments.. ~eeds
D
Jy qualified.
competent in most
ments. Frequently
some supcrv1s1on.
s
or tho remaining ns-
demonstrates excel-
Basically qualified.
E
poets.
F requently
Jent performance.
n
demonstrates out-
V
standini: perform-
E
ance.
D
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
I nadequate per-
!ormnuco in many
aspects or bis duty
assignments. Needs
closo supervision.
He is not qualified.
(Adverse)
15. ConsldorJng t h o possiblo requirements of
Part1cularly
Prefer not
w:,r, In dicate y ou r .iittlt udo tolYard having
dcslro to
Prefer him D
Bo pica.sod to
Bo s:ntfsffod
to havo him?
t his officer under your comm.iind. Would you:
have him?
□
t o m ost?
havo h im?
□
to han him? [lJ
(Advo:-se)
□
16. (a) In comparison with other officers of his grade and approximate length of service, how would you designate this officer?
(b) For this report period Indicate In (b) how many officers of his grade you have designated In each category of (a) .
One ol tho !cw highly
A very fine officer or
A dopcudable nnd typi-
An acccptnblo officer
outstnnding officers I
great valuo to tho
cslly e!Yectivo olllccr
know
service
(a)
X
(b)
1
Unsatisfactory
(Adverse)
17. COMMENTS. I,i this sec/1011 1t i, ,m'!'ortant tllat the ouwandmo charactemt1c1 of the officer, and anu weal:ne,se, wl11ch smouslv affect hi• performance of dutu, be reported.
The
apprailal should be condse and concrete m term• of specific examples ofperformance from which the more gweral f actor, can be inferred. The apprauat wiU ju1tifv lhe mark• as1ign,d in
ue,na 14, 16, and JG, above. In ad//iti~n1 the apprai, al sh~uld include outst.andino qualifications in anu fiold such a• the f ollowing: administration, vlanninq, logistic,, eleclronics, new
weapons, and in dealing with the public m personal or official contact,. Thu space mu,t not be left blank.
CHPHOT NEWHOUSE has performed his assigned duties in a satisfactory manner.
He i s
fairly well versed in his technical speci alty and has maintained high r equirements of
worlananship of personnel in the Photogra~hic Divi si on.
Through a continuing mai nt enance
program he has rnajntained the l aboratory in an excel l ent mat eri al condi tion and, as
noted in paragraph 20, has also improved the state of material r eadi ness of photographi c
equipment.
18. NAME, GRADE, AND FILE NUMBER OF REPORTING OFFICER. OFFICIAL STATUS RELATIVE TO OFFICER REPORTED ON.
B. F. ROWE, CDR, 08J860/1Jl 0. Commanding Officer.
10- 101og-1