John Company

Final Personnel Record for Newhouse, Delbert C., U.S. Navy, 1957

DOW-UAP-D104 · page 534 of 585

Page 534 of 585 of DOW-UAP-D104

Text

This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.

•
•
19. in co,;,parlson with other officers of his grade and approximate length of service or approximate length of duty assignment, to what degree has this officer exhibited
the following qualities?
(a) PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE (Consider the requirements of his various duty assignments and compare them to his professional knowledge.)
I
. NOT OBSERVED
□
Has exceptional knowledge
or his duty assignments.
Extremely well informed.
Hns excellent ln1owledge of
most phases of his duty
assignments. Is well in­
formed on tbe remaining
phases. OccnsionaUy dem­
onstrates exceptional knowl­
edge.
Is well informed on most
phases or his duty nssigu­
moots. Frequently demon­
strates oxcoUeut knowledge.
Ifos S<~tis!oetory knowledge
of routine phases of his duty
assignments.
Serious gnps in his knowl­
edge or rundamentnls or bis
duty ussig1unouts.
(Ad verso)
I
I
J,.
I
I
(b) COOPERATION (Consider ability and willingness to work In harmony with and for others.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Extremely successful in
working with others. Has
nn outstanding ability to .
create harmony.
Promotes harmony in deal-
Ing with others. A very
good team worker.
Gets along wen with most
people. Knows how to tnke
orders. Fits in with a team.'
IndiUerent to others.
Cooporatcs oconslopnUy._
J
Inclined to create friction.
Oeuernlly 1,1ot cooperative.
. (Advcrso)
•
I
I
I
X
I·
. .
(c) J UDGMENT (Consider his ability to grasp a situation, t hink clearly, and develop correct and lo2lcal conclusions.)
Outstandingly SOUlld and
Exceptionally good judg-
Judb'lllcnt is usuolly sound
Is prono to neglect or mis-
Duo to faulty judgment, his
NOT OBSERVED
logical thinker with an
mcnt based on sound evalu-
and rcnsouable.
in tcrpret !nets. Occasion-
decisions or rccommcndn-
□
o.,coptional grasp or tho
ntlon of au tho factors
nlly commits errors in
tions ore too CrcqucnUy
situation involved.
involved.
Judgment.
wrong.
( . .\dverso)
.
I
I
I
X
I
.
(d) LEADERSHIP (Consider his ability In organizing, obtaining the cooperation of others, and In directing their efforts effectively.)
1 NOT OBSERVED
□
Outstanding skill ln direct-
ing others results in a very
ollectivc unit. Ins~ires con­
lldcnco even un er very
difficult clrcurnstnnccs.
A consistently good lender.
Commands respect or bis
subordinates. Is very crrcc­
t!vc under difficult circum­
stances.
Capable lender. Develops
good cooperation and tcnm
work in difficult circum­
stances. Knows bow to givo
orders.
Generally obtains effective
cooperation under normal
circumstances.
Fails to command. Unable
to exert control.
(Adverse)
.
I
I
I
X
I
.
(e) PROMOTION POTENTIAL (Consider his capacity to handle Jobs of Increased scope and greater responsibility, ability to learn rapidly, personality, self.Improvement
efforts, special abilities, and training.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Cnpablo ofincreased respon­
sihllity and rapid advnncc­
moot.
.
Vcry promising promotional
mntcrini.
Demonstrates promiso for
further growth at moderato
rate.
Present Job is taxing bis
capabilities. Requires con­
sidcrabloomountor training.
Definitely limited.
(AdYerse)
I
I
X
I
I
.
(f) MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS (Conside r his utilization of men, money, and materials.)
NOT OBSERVED
□
Is moste!TeetJ\·e in tho ut!li­
zation of men, money, ond
materials.
Is effective in occomplishing
oxtrn Sllvings in men, mon­
cy, nnd moterinls by imple­
monting and mniDtnining
improved mauagcmon t pro­
ccdurcs.
Conscn·cs men, money, nnd
materials effectively by irn­
plomcuting and maintain­
ing routine mnnogement
procedures.
Utilizes men, money, and
mntcri:lls iu o barely sntis­
factory manner.
Is needlessly wasteful or
mcnt money, nntl runtcrinls.
Is irresponsible in
this
regard.
(Adverse)
.
I
I
X
I
I
.
(g) REMARKS. Marks In any of the starred (•) boxes must be Justified In this section with a brief description of the factors which were considered In evaluaung the
officer.
The Justification should be In concrete and specific terms.
20. State your estimate of this officer's capacity for original and constructive professional work and Indicate to what degree his performance during this reporting
period has reflected that capacity. State concrete attainments wherever possible. If not observed , so state.
..
.
CHPHOT NEWHOUSE has a sound knowledge of· the workings of the 'Photographic Supply System
and, during t he period of t his report , he has used this knowl edge to good purpose. He
evaluated the material condition of the photographic equipment and has raised the state
of material readiness by replacing obsol ete and worn items.
21. (a) As a general rule, officers should not be shown their fitness reports by the reporting seniors unless the report contains adverse matter. An adverse report
must be referred for statement pursuant to Article 1701-(8) Navy Regulations.
HIs statement should be attached tothis. report.
(b) Has the officer reported on seen this report?
YES □ NO ~
22. DATE roRwARDED ______
~ l_95_5._ _
l l Ja_nu_a_ry_ _ _
_
23. - /~~o:
~
a~
~
~
~
-l -----,--,------,--­
(Sig11at11re of ro11ortinq oDicer)
• \
24·----~.,---~-.,----,--~~---,------ ---
­
(Sigllature of regular reporting ,wior if report i8 co11curreut)
•
U. S. GOYERHMEHT PRINTIHCii OFFICE