AAWSAP DIRD, An Introduction to the Statistical Drake Equation, March 2010
DOW-UAP-D127 · page 17 of 55
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
UNCLASSIFIED/ /FOR OFFI&IAk Wlii QPU,¥ (]'' surprised to find out that it equals (N) = e11 e2 ::::: 4589 .559 ~ 4590 communicating civilizations now in the galaxy. This is the important number, and it is HIGHER than the 3500 provided by the classical Drake equation. Thus, in conclusion, THE STATISTICAL EXTENSION of the classical Drake equation INCREASES OUR HOPES to find an extraterrestriaI civiIization ! PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION OF N 1000 2000 3000 4000 N = Number of ET Civilizations in Galaxy Figure 2. Comparing the Two Probability Density Functions of the Random Variable N Found (1) Without Resorting to the CLT at All (thick curve) and (2) Using the CLT and the Relevant Lognormal Approximation (thin curve). Even more so our hopes are increased when we go on to consider the standard deviation associated with the mean value 4590. In fact, the standard deviation is given ,,., by equation (97) of Appendix B. This yields er"' = e11 e2 ✓e" 2 -1 =11195 and so the expected number of N may actually be even much higher than the 4590 provided by the mean value alone! The "upper limit of the one-sigma confidence interval" (as statisticians call it), i.e. the sum 4590+11195 = 15,785, yields a higher number still! (Note: the "lower limit of the one-sigma confidence interval is ZERO because the lognormal distribution is POSITIVE (or, more correctly, non-negative)). Finally, the reader should note that the thick curve depicted in Figure 2 is just the NUMERICAL solution of the statistical Drake equation for a FINITE number of 7 input factors. Figure 2 actually shows that this curve "is well interpolated" by the lognormal distribution (thin curve), i.e., by the neat analytical expression provided by the Central Limit Theorem for an INFINITE number of factors in the Drake equation. That is, in conclusion, Figure 2 visually shows that taking 7 factors or an infinity of factors "is almost the same thing" already for a value as small as 7. UNCLASSIFIED/ /FOil OFFI@IAb W&i QNI.¥ 17