AAWSAP DIRD, An Introduction to the Statistical Drake Equation, March 2010
DOW-UAP-D127 · page 39 of 55
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
UNCLASSIFIED/ /fOR OFFI&IAk Wlii QPU,¥ Put in loose terms, the CLT states that, if one has a sum of random variables eve11 NOT identically distributed, this sum tends to a normal distribution whe11 the 11umber of tenns maki11g up the sum te11ds to infinity. Also, the normal distribution mean value is the sum of the mean values of the addend random variables, and the normal distribution variance is the sum of the variances ofthe addend random variables. Let us now write down the equations of the CLT in the form needed to apply it to our Statistical Drake equation (3). The idea is to apply the CLT to the sum of random variables given by (4) and (5) whatever their probability distributions ca11 possibly be. Tn other words, the CL T applied to the Statistical Drake equation (3) leads immediately to the following three equations: I) The sum of the (arbitrarily distributed) independent random variables Y; makes up the new random variable Y. 2) The sum of their mean values makes up the new mean value of Y. 3) The sum of their variances makes up the new variance of Y. In equations: 7 y = :~::vi i =I 7 (Y) = I(Y; ) (48) i=I 7 2 ="' O'y L..Jo-r2, i= I This completes our synthetic description of the CL T for sw11s of random variables. 6. THE LOGNORMAL DISTRIBTIO IS THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE NUMBER N OF EXTRATERRESTRIAL CIVILIZATIONS IN THE GALAXY The CLT may ofcourse be exte11ded to products of random variables upon taki11g the logs of both sides, just as we did in equatio11 (3). It then follows that the exponent random variable, like Y i11 (6), tends to a 11ormal random variable, and, as a co11seque11ce, it follows that the base random variable, like N i11 (6), te11ds to a lognormal random variable. To understand this fact better in mathematical terms consider again of the transformation law (9) of random variables. The question is: what is the probability density function of the random variable N in equation (6), that is, what is the probability density function of the lognormal distribution? To find it, set (49) This, upon inversion, yields the single root x1(y) =x(y) =!n(y). (50) On the other hand, differentiating (49) one gets where (50) was already used in the last step. The general transformation law (9) finally yields ( ) "' fx(x;(y)) 1 ( ( )) fNY= L..J i '( ()~=- /ylny • (52) i g X; )' ~ 11y Therefore, replacing the probability density on the right by virtue of the well-known normal (or Gaussian) distribution given by equation (7), the lognormal distribution of equation (47) is found , and the derivation of the lognormal distribution from the normal distribution is proved. In view of future calculations, it is also useful to point out the so-called "Gaussian integral", that is: B2 f"' e - Ax2 e 8 ·x dx = ~ •e 4 A A> 0 B =real. (53) L., VA ' ' This follows immediately from the normalization condition of the Gaussian (7), that is oo (x-pf 1 -- , J-- e lu· dx=l (54) &a- ' --Oj just upon expanding the square at the exponent and making the two replacements (we skip all steps) l A= -- >0, 2 2a (55) l B = ; 2 = real. UNCLASSIFIED/ /FOR 8FFIGl.t.k W&i ,n11.¥ 39