Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part I, 1965
NASA-UAP-D019 · page 34 of 223
Text
This text came with the file. It may have mistakes. When the text and the image disagree, the image is right.
29 Conrad .. Cooper Conrad Cooper FCSD REP Cooper Conrad Cooper ONEl0EtslJl~E wrong. We really had good comm the whole flight. There was never a time -- the only time the only fault we find was one or two times through the remote site when the MCC was trying to remote to these sites they would get some fading. I must say the HF worked excellent. When they were ~r~usic, broadcasting music to us, my\ gosh they had us practically the world round on '-----~The music quality was quite _g0od in most cases. I got times on that we can bring out later so that they can correlate how far GO/NO GO , there wasn't any problem on that. They gave us the GO right away. How long did it take them to give this? Oh, heck, immediately. Almost immediately. .> vveaf There was no swivel because there was no velocity ~ correction. There was no velocity correction needed. Orbit quantitites were good, they had those for us. It took them quite a while to read us our experiments but they just said you have a nominal orbit and then mayb_e . . . . . eQNFIE>ENTl~t